Segment
1. Firestone Destination Winter Upper-middle2. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Firestone Destination Winter vs. Nokian WR D4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Firestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (65%) than Nokian (52%). But when it comes to comparing Firestone Destination Winter and Nokian WR D4, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Firestone Destination Winter was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR D4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the Destination Winter and the WR D4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Firestone Destination Winter dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (97%) of the Nokian WR D4 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Firestone Destination Winter
| Nokian WR D4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR D4 6.04
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. Firestone Destination Winter Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended2. Firestone Destination Winter Satisfactory
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
Snow handling
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
Snow traction
1. Nokian WR D4 89%
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
1. Nokian WR D4 81%
Dry driving behavior
1. Nokian WR D4 72%
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
2. Nokian WR D4 67%
Fuel efficiency
1. Nokian WR D4 86%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Nokian WR D4 69%
Interior noise
2. Nokian WR D4 69%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
1. Nokian WR D4 85%
Ice lateral guidance
2. Nokian WR D4 82%
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
| Firestone Destination Winter Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,5 | 3,2 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 3,6 | 2,0 | 1,9 |
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,6 | 2,5 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | ||||||||
