Segment
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium2. Firestone Destination Winter Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Firestone (65%). But when it comes to comparing Firestone Destination Winter and Michelin Alpin 5, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Firestone Destination Winter was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Michelin Alpin 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the Destination Winter and the Alpin 5 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Firestone Destination Winter dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (88%) of the Michelin Alpin 5 also have B wet ratings.
# | Firestone Destination Winter
| Michelin Alpin 5
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R15 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium2. Firestone Destination Winter Upper-middle
1. Michelin Alpin 5 5.88
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good2. Firestone Destination Winter Satisfactory
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended2. Firestone Destination Winter Satisfactory
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
Firestone Destination Winter Rating: Satisfactory | 3,5 | 3,2 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 3,6 | 2,0 | 1,9 |
Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 3,8 | 0,5 | 2,3 |
Show test details |