Segment
1. Falken Linam VAN01 Upper-middle2. Kumho PorTran KC53 Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken Linam VAN01 vs. Kumho PorTran KC53
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Kumho (60%). But when it comes to comparing Falken Linam VAN01 and Kumho PorTran KC53, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the Linam VAN01 and the PorTran KC53 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 96% of Falken Linam VAN01 has A wet grip rating, whereas 93% of Kumho PorTran KC53 has C rating.
| # | Falken Linam VAN01
| Kumho PorTran KC53
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Falken Linam VAN01 72 dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | |
| Falken Linam VAN01 Rating: Poor | nedostatečné | 4,6 | 2,8 | 3,2 | 0,5 | 2,0 | |
| Kumho PorTran KC53 Rating: Sufficient | dostatečné | 3,8 | 3,2 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 2,0 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
