Segment
1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Premium2. Falken Linam VAN01 Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken Linam VAN01 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear). Generally, Goodyear summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Falken (70%). But when it comes to comparing Falken Linam VAN01 and Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the Linam VAN01 and the Efficientgrip Cargo were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 96% of Falken Linam VAN01 has A wet grip rating, whereas 74% of Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo has B rating.
| # | Falken Linam VAN01
| Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Falken Linam VAN01 72 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | |
| Falken Linam VAN01 Rating: Poor | nedostatečné | 4,6 | 2,8 | 3,2 | 0,5 | 2,0 | |
| GoodYear Efficientgrip Cargo Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,1 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 0,5 | 2,0 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
