Segment
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken Landair LA/AT T110 vs. Nokian WR SUV 4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Falken allround tyres are slightly better rated (65%) than Nokian (61%). When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Falken Landair LA/AT T110 has E wet grip rating, whereas 89% of Nokian WR SUV 4 has C rating.
| # | Falken Landair LA/AT T110
| Nokian WR SUV 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R15 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Test winner
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Good