Segment
1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Falken winter tyres are slightly better rated (44%) than Kumho (38%). In this particular case, the Falken EuroWinter HS01 has a better rating of 61% compared to 20% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP51. The first tyre test of Falken EuroWinter HS01 was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP51 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2021 195/65 R15 test, where both the EuroWinter HS01 and the WinterCraft WP51 were tested. See more mutual tests below. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the EuroWinter HS01 is made in Turkey and WinterCraft WP51 is made in Korea.
# | Falken EuroWinter HS01
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R13 - R21 | R13 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Satisfactory2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Sufficient2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 1,6 | 1,9 | 1,9 | 2,0 | 2,6 | 2,0 |
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,7 | 2,3 | 2,4 | 2,4 | 2,9 | 3,0 |
Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Rating: Sufficient | dostatečné | 3,0 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 2,7 | 3,0 |
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
Falken EuroWinter HS01 | 36,2 | 29,5 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | 37,8 | 29,8 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | velmi doporučeno | 1,8 | 2,1 | 1,9 | 2,2 | 2,6 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 2,5 | 2,7 | 2,9 | 2,9 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 2,8 | 2,7 | 3,2 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 3,0 | 2,3 |
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
Falken EuroWinter HS01 | 36,2 | 28 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | 38,8 | 28 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 1,8 | 1,7 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 3,0 | 1,5 | 1,7 |
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,6 | 2,6 | 3,1 | 2,9 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,3 |
Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,3 | 2,4 | 2,6 | 2,4 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,3 |
Show test details |