Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Upper-middle2. Nokian Wetproof SUV Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Nokian (66%). In this particular case, the Falken Azenis FK510 SUV has a better rating of 67% compared to 51% of the Nokian Wetproof SUV. The first tyre test of Falken Azenis FK510 SUV was done in 2020, compared to 2021 when was the Nokian Wetproof SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Promobil 2022 235/55 R17 test, where both the Azenis FK510 SUV and the Wetproof SUV were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 57% of Falken Azenis FK510 SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian Wetproof SUV also have A wet ratings. We also know where Azenis FK510 SUV is made - Japan.
# | Falken Azenis FK510 SUV
| Nokian Wetproof SUV
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R16 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Upper-middle2. Nokian Wetproof SUV Upper-middle
1. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Very good -
2. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | velmi doporučeno | 7,3 | 7,7 | 5,9 | |||
Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 8,6 | 8,8 | 7,6 | |||
Nokian WetProof SUV Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 8,0 | 7,9 | 7,3 | |||
Show test details |