Comparison: Falken Azenis FK510 SUV vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Kumho (60%). In this particular case, the Falken Azenis FK510 SUV has a better rating of 67% compared to 64% of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV. The first tyre test of Falken Azenis FK510 SUV was done in 2020, compared to 2025 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 57% of Falken Azenis FK510 SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (94%) of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV also have A wet ratings. We also know where Azenis FK510 SUV is made - Japan.
| # | Falken Azenis FK510 SUV
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
