Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Premium2. Falken Azenis FK453 Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken Azenis FK453 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Vredestein (55%). But when it comes to comparing Falken Azenis FK453 and Vredestein Ultrac Vorti, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Falken Azenis FK453 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Automotorsport 2016 235/40 R18 test, where both the Azenis FK453 and the Ultrac Vorti were tested.
| # | Falken Azenis FK453
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R24 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Exemplary2. Falken Azenis FK453 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Falken Azenis FK453 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,4 | velmi doporučeno | 9,6 | 9,5 | 10 | 10 | |
| Falken Azenis FK453 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,8 | podmíněně doporučeno | 7,5 | 8,2 | 6 | 10 | |
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Recommended | 8,5 | doporučeno | 8,1 | 9,5 | 5 | 7 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
