Segment
2. Falken Azenis FK453 Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken Azenis FK453 vs. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear). Generally, Goodyear summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Falken (70%). But when it comes to comparing Falken Azenis FK453 and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Falken Azenis FK453 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Automotorsport 2016 235/40 R18 test, where both the Azenis FK453 and the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Falken Azenis FK453 has A wet grip rating, whereas 49% of Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 has B rating.
| # | Falken Azenis FK453
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Highly recommended2. Falken Azenis FK453 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK453 Conditionally recommended2. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Still recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,4 | velmi doporučeno | 9,6 | 9,5 | 10 | 10 | |
| Falken Azenis FK453 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,8 | podmíněně doporučeno | 7,5 | 8,2 | 6 | 10 | |
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Rating: Highly recommended | 9,4 | velmi doporučeno | 9,6 | 9,3 | 10 | 8 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
