Segment
1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Premium2. Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro Lowcost
Comparison: Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro vs. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Switzerland (Esa-Tecar) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Esa-Tecar (55%). Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2020 235/55 R17 test, where both the Super Grip Pro and the PILOT ALPIN 5 were tested.
| # | Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro
| Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Exemplary2. Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro Satisfactory
Comfort
(Overall rating)Interior noise
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow traction
Ice
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,5 | 1,9 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 2,6 | 0,8 | 1,8 |
| Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,6 | 2,7 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 3,5 | 0,8 | 2,3 |
| Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 Rating: Good | dobré | 2,3 | 1,9 | 1,8 | 2,4 | 3,0 | 1,5 | 2,1 |
| Show test details | ||||||||
