Segment
1. Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro Lowcost2. Viking Protech NewGen Lowcost
Comparison: Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro vs. Viking Protech NewGen
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from . Generally, Esa+Tecar summer tyres are slightly better rated (65%) than Viking (26%). In this particular case, the Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro has a better rating of 50% compared to 28% of the Viking Protech NewGen. The first tyre test of Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro was done in 2020, compared to 2021 when was the Viking Protech NewGen first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Spirit Pro and the Protech NewGen were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro
| Viking Protech NewGen
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | |||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro 13.252. Viking Protech NewGen 32.17
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
1. Viking Protech NewGen Satisfactory2. Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro Rating: Good | 2,3 | 3,4 | |||||
| Viking Protech NewGen Rating: Good | 2,5 | 3,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | |||
| Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro Rating: Satisfactory | 2,3 | 2,8 | 2,9 | 1,5 | |||
| Viking Protech NewGen Rating: Satisfactory | 3,5 | 3,3 | 3,0 | 2,0 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
