Segment
1. Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro Lowcost2. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Esa+Tecar) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Maxxis). Generally, Maxxis summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Esa+Tecar (65%). In this particular case, the Maxxis Premitra HP5 has a better rating of 69% compared to 65% of the Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro. The first tyre test of Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro was done in 2020, compared to 2017 when was the Maxxis Premitra HP5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2020 235/55 R17 test, where both the Spirit Pro and the Premitra HP5 were tested.
# | Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro
| Maxxis Premitra HP5
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R18 | ||
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro Lowcost2. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Lowcost
2. Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro 13.25
1. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Very good
1. Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro Satisfactory2. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Conditionally recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | doporučeno | 2,2 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 1,0 | 1,2 | |
Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,4 | 2,5 | 1,0 | 2,1 | |
Maxxis Premitra HP5 Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 2,4 | 1,9 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 2,3 | |
Show test details |