In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Duraturn) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (38%) than Duraturn (1%). But when it comes to comparing Duraturn Mozzo Winter and Kumho WinterCraft WP71, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Duraturn Mozzo Winter was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the Mozzo Winter and the WinterCraft WP71 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Duraturn Mozzo Winter
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R16 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 30,3 | ||||||
Duraturn Mozzo Winter | 40,7 | ||||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 | 35,7 | 28 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
Duraturn Mozzo Winter | 37,6 | - | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 | 31,5 | 24,8 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
Duraturn Mozzo Winter | 41,5 | - | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 | 34,8 | 29,2 | |||||
Show test details |