Segment
1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
Comparison: Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71
Table of contents:
| # | Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
| Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Welcome to the comparison between two high-performance summer tyres, the Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 and the Kumho Ecsta PS71. Both are products of well-respected manufacturers - Dunlop and Kumho respectively.
Firstly, let’s take a look at the Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2, which overall achieved a rating of 72% in our testing process. A notable advantage of this tyre is its superior performance in aquaplaning conditions - both cross and longitudinal. It earned a commendable 11th place out of 53 tyres tested in the AutoBild test, demonstrating its solid performance in wet road conditions. Criticism, however, came from the autobild 2025 test where it reported delayed steering response on dry roads
On to the the Kumho Ecsta PS71 which earned an overall rating of 68%. Rankings from both AutoBild and ADAC tests place this tyre at the higher end of the scale with positions at 18th out of 53 tyres and 3rd out of 17 tyres respectively. The Kumho PS71’s strengths lie in its an impressive balance in handling and performance, short braking distances in both wet and dry conditions, and fair price. However, it did draw attention due to its raised noise level during driving.
In a head-to-head comparison, the Dunlop tyre performs better in aquaplaning situations, but the Kumho tyre wins out due to its well-rounded performance and handling capabilities. From the data gathered from all of our tests, we find that the Dunlop tyre excels in wet road situations, particularly aquaplaning, while the Kumho tyre provides an overall more balanced performance in both wet and dry conditions, despite the heightened noise levels during operation.
In summary, your final selection will depend largely on the specific conditions you frequently encounter. For drivers dealing with a lot more aquatic road conditions, the Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 may be a better match. For those who require an all-around performer, regardless of increased noise, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 is likely the more suitable choice. As always, remember to keep your specific driving needs and situation in mind when choosing tyres.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Still recommended
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,5 | |||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Rating: Good | 2,9 | 2,2 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 2,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 | 35.2 | 31.5 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 34.2 | 27.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 | 61.8 | 27 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 61.7 | 26.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | |||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 1,8 | 2,8 | 2,5 | |||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Good | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 2,0 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 1 | 2 | 3- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 | 34,3 | 33 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 34,9 | 29 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Rating: Good | 2- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 3- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 | 35,4 | 31,4 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 37,1 | 31,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
