Segment
1. Dunlop Quattromaxx Premium2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle
Comparison: Dunlop Quattromaxx vs. Kumho Crugen HP91
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Dunlop) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Dunlop is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Dunlop summer tyres are slightly better rated (72%) than Kumho (60%). But when it comes to comparing Dunlop Quattromaxx and Kumho Crugen HP91, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 235/50 R18 test, where both the Quattromaxx and the Crugen HP91 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Dunlop Quattromaxx dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (66%) of the Kumho Crugen HP91 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Dunlop Quattromaxx
| Kumho Crugen HP91
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Dunlop Quattromaxx Exemplary2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Offroad | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Dunlop Quattromaxx Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2+ | 2 | 2 | |||
| Kumho Crugen HP91 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 2- | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||