Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Debica Presto Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto vs. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Debica (67%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Presto and the Ventus Prime3 K125 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Debica Presto has C wet grip rating, whereas 76% of Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 has A rating.
| # | Debica Presto
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Debica Presto 16.
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
| Debica Presto | 38,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | 34,6 | 27,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
