Segment
1. Debica Presto UHP2 Lowcost2. Nexen N Fera Primus Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto UHP2 vs. Nexen N Fera Primus
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen). Generally, Debica summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Nexen (61%). In this particular case, the Nexen N Fera Primus has a better rating of 71% compared to 52% of the Debica Presto UHP2. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Presto UHP2 and the N Fera Primus were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Debica Presto UHP2
| Nexen N Fera Primus
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R18 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nexen N Fera Primus 12.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nexen N Fera Primus Satisfactory2. Debica Presto UHP2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nexen N Fera Primus Satisfactory2. Debica Presto UHP2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Debica Presto UHP2 68 dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Debica Presto UHP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Nexen N Fera Primus Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2- | 3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Debica Presto UHP2 | 36,5 | 29,8 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Primus | 37,2 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||