Segment
1. Debica Presto UHP2 Lowcost2. Gt Radial Fe2 Suv Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto UHP2 vs. Gt Radial Fe2 Suv
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (Gt). Generally, Debica summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Gt (51%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Presto UHP2 and the Radial Fe2 Suv were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Debica Presto UHP2
| Gt Radial Fe2 Suv
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R18 | R16 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Gt Radial Fe2 Suv 19.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Presto UHP2 Satisfactory2. Gt Radial Fe2 Suv Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Presto UHP2 Satisfactory2. Gt Radial Fe2 Suv Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | |||
| Debica Presto UHP2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2 | 2 | 3+ | |||
| Gt Radial Fe2 Suv Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2- | 3+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Debica Presto UHP2 | 36,5 | 29,8 | |||||
| Gt Radial Fe2 Suv | 37 | 29,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
