Segment
1. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto UHP 2 vs. Nokian Powerproof
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Debica summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Nokian (66%). In this particular case, the Debica Presto UHP 2 has a better rating of 56% compared to 54% of the Nokian Powerproof. The first tyre test of Debica Presto UHP 2 was done in 2024, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian Powerproof first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 70% of Debica Presto UHP 2 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian Powerproof also have A wet ratings.
| # | Debica Presto UHP 2
| Nokian Powerproof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R19 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian Powerproof 7.45
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory2. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
