Segment
1. Debica Presto UHP 2 Lowcost2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto UHP 2 vs. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn). Generally, Debica summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Laufenn (58%). The first tyre test of Debica Presto UHP 2 was done in 2024, compared to 2021 when was the Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Presto UHP 2 and the S Fit EQ+ LK01 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 70% of Debica Presto UHP 2 has A wet grip rating, whereas 97% of Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 has B rating.
| # | Debica Presto UHP 2
| Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R19 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Satisfactory2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Debica Presto UHP 2 | 36.4 | 33.1 | |||||
| Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 | 34.9 | 29.7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
