Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto UHP 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Debica summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Kumho (60%). In this particular case, the Debica Presto UHP 2 has a better rating of 71% compared to 68% of the Kumho Ecsta PS71. The first tyre test of Debica Presto UHP 2 was done in 2024, compared to 2018 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 76% of Debica Presto UHP 2 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (76%) of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Debica Presto UHP 2
| Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R19 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended