Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Premium2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto UHP 2 vs. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Debica (67%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 has a better rating of 74% compared to 71% of the Debica Presto UHP 2. The first tyre test of Debica Presto UHP 2 was done in 2024, compared to 2019 when was the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 76% of Debica Presto UHP 2 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (94%) of the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Debica Presto UHP 2
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R19 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Exemplary2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Satisfactory