Comparison: Debica Presto UHP 2 vs. Falken Azenis FK510
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Debica (67%). In this particular case, the Falken Azenis FK510 has a better rating of 63% compared to 56% of the Debica Presto UHP 2. The first tyre test of Debica Presto UHP 2 was done in 2024, compared to 2016 when was the Falken Azenis FK510 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 70% of Debica Presto UHP 2 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (69%) of the Falken Azenis FK510 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Debica Presto UHP 2
| Falken Azenis FK510
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R19 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Interior noise
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB
