Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto UHP 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Debica (67%). In this particular case, the Continental PremiumContact 6 has a better rating of 83% compared to 71% of the Debica Presto UHP 2. The first tyre test of Debica Presto UHP 2 was done in 2024, compared to 2017 when was the Continental PremiumContact 6 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 76% of Debica Presto UHP 2 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (89%) of the Continental PremiumContact 6 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Debica Presto UHP 2
| Continental PremiumContact 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R19 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory
