Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto UHP 2 vs. Bridgestone Turanza 6
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Debica (67%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 has a better rating of 83% compared to 71% of the Debica Presto UHP 2. The first tyre test of Debica Presto UHP 2 was done in 2024, compared to 2023 when was the Bridgestone Turanza 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2024 215/55 R17 test, where both the Presto UHP 2 and the Turanza 6 were tested.
| # | Debica Presto UHP 2
| Bridgestone Turanza 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R19 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,6 | 1,7 | ||||
| Debica Presto UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,6 | 2,6 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,2 | 2,8 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
