Segment
1. Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 Premium2. Debica Presto HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto HP2 vs. Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
Table of contents:
| # | Debica Presto HP2
| Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R16 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Let's consider two summer tyres, the Debica Presto HP2 and the Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2, both of which are designed for high-performance. In comparison, the Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2, a touring type, ranks higher with an 86% rating, than the Debica Presto HP2 with a percentage rating of 79%, according to our ratings.
The Debica Presto HP2, manufactured by Debica, was placed 15th in the ADAC test and 16th in the Autobild test out of 50 and 53 tyres respectively, fares quite well with its good environmental balance, superior mileage, and wear and tear performance. However, it does display certain weaknesses in driving safety.
Its competitor in consideration, the Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2, manufactured by Pirelli, achieved 17th position in the ADAC test and 2nd in the Autobild test. This model, which also happens to be the successor of the Pirelli P7 Cinturato, performs well on dry surfaces. It scores decent marks on mileage and efficiency but loses points on balance, particularly in its performance on wet surfaces, environmental balance, and wear resistance.
In mutual test positions, the Debica Presto HP2 outperforms Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 in the ADAC test, whilst in the Autobild test the tables turn in favor of Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2.
In conclusion, the Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 is the stronger contender overall, with a higher test position and our overall rating. But it can't be dismissed that Debica Presto HP2 comes with a superior price/value ratio amongst its best features, providing the consumers a more economical alternative without substantially compromising on performance. Whichever tyre you choose depends on your demands on tyre characteristics, performance areas, and budget preference.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Debica Presto HP2 12.8
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Presto HP2 Exemplary2. Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Debica Presto HP2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Debica Presto HP2 70 dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | |||||
| Debica Presto HP2 Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 2,3 | |||||
| Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 2,6 | 2,7 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Debica Presto HP2 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 Rating: Good | dobré | 1- | 1- | 3+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Debica Presto HP2 | 36,3 | 31,9 | |||||
| Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 | 34,5 | 29,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
