Segment
1. Michelin e.Primacy Premium2. Debica Presto HP2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Debica (67%). In this particular case, the Michelin e.Primacy has a better rating of 71% compared to 70% of the Debica Presto HP2. The first tyre test of Debica Presto HP2 was done in 2021, compared to 2023 when was the Michelin e.Primacy first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Presto HP2 and the e.Primacy were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Debica Presto HP2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin e.Primacy also have B wet ratings.
# | Debica Presto HP2
| Michelin e.Primacy
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R15 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin e.Primacy Premium2. Debica Presto HP2 Lowcost
2. Debica Presto HP2 12.8
1. Debica Presto HP2 Exemplary2. Michelin e.Primacy Very good
1. Debica Presto HP2 Satisfactory2. Michelin e.Primacy Sufficient
1. Debica Presto HP2 70 dB
Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,3 | ||||||
Debica Presto HP2 Rating: Good | 2,3 | ||||||
Michelin e.Primacy Rating: Sufficient | 1,3 | 3,9 | |||||
Show test details |