Segment
1. Debica Presto HP2 Lowcost2. Fulda EcoControl HP Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto HP2 vs. Fulda EcoControl HP
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Generally, Fulda summer tyres are slightly better rated (73%) than Debica (67%). The first tyre test of Debica Presto HP2 was done in 2021, compared to 2016 when was the Fulda EcoControl HP first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Debica Presto HP2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (71%) of the Fulda EcoControl HP also have B wet ratings.
| # | Debica Presto HP2
| Fulda EcoControl HP
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Debica Presto HP2 12.8
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Presto HP2 Exemplary2. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended2. Debica Presto HP2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Debica Presto HP2 70 dB
