Segment
1. BFGoodrich Advantage Upper-middle2. Debica Presto HP2 Lowcost
# | Debica Presto HP2
| BFGoodrich Advantage
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R14 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The comparison between two summer tyres, the Debica Presto HP2 and the BFGoodrich Advantage, shows distinct differences that can assist potential buyers in making an informed decision.
The Debica tyre performs reasonably well across different test platforms. It ranked 16th in the Autobild test out of a total of 53 tyres. This shows a notable level of dependability. Advantages mentioned for the Debica Presto HP2 include its price/value ratio, making it a good budget choice. Autobild 2024 mentioned its beneficial environmental impact, good lifetime, wear resistance and efficiency. However, the test signalled slight imbalances and weaknesses in driving safety. Overall, our rating for the Debica Presto HP2 is 79%.
On the other hand, the BFGoodrich Advantage came in slightly lower in the Autobild test, securing 18th position. It scored particularly well in comfort and dry handling categories, where it was singled out twice for its performance. Autobild 2024 highlighted its dynamic dry handling, low rolling noise, low rolling resistance and affordable price. It lost points for its tendency to understeer in wet conditions. The BFGoodrich Advantage earned an overall rating of 68% from us.
In the ADAC test, both tyres presented a difference in placement, with Debica Presto HP2 securing the 15th position and BFGoodrich Advantage scoring slightly lower, taking the 21st position out of 50 tyres. Despite neither tyre ending up in the top 10, both showed reasonable performance, although the Debica Presto HP2 seems to have a slight edge.
To summarize, the Debica Presto HP2 seems to be a good choice for price-sensitive buyers looking for a tyre with good environmental features and acceptable safety performance. The BFGoodrich Advantage provides a comfortable ride and great dry handling, but might be less suitable for regions with a lot of rain due to its tendency to understeer in wet conditions. Both tyres do not seem to be replaced with newer models currently, but stay tuned for future updates.
1. BFGoodrich Advantage Upper-middle2. Debica Presto HP2 Lowcost
1. BFGoodrich Advantage 12.752. Debica Presto HP2 12.8
1. Debica Presto HP2 Exemplary
1. Debica Presto HP2 Satisfactory2. BFGoodrich Advantage Sufficient
1. Debica Presto HP2 70 dB
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
Debica Presto HP2 | 37,4 | 30,2 | |||||
BFGoodrich Advantage | 37,4 | 29,1 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | |||||
Debica Presto HP2 Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 2,3 | |||||
BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 2,8 | 2,9 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 1 | |||
Debica Presto HP2 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2+ | 2- | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
Debica Presto HP2 | 36,3 | 31,9 | |||||
BFGoodrich Advantage | 36,7 | 31,9 | |||||
Show test details |