Segment
1. Michelin Energy Saver + Premium2. Debica Presto HP Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto HP vs. Michelin Energy Saver +
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Debica (67%). But when it comes to comparing Debica Presto HP and Michelin Energy Saver +, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Debica Presto HP was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Michelin Energy Saver + first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Presto HP and the Energy Saver + were tested.
| # | Debica Presto HP
| Michelin Energy Saver +
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R16 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Energy Saver + Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Energy Saver + Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Debica Presto HP | 37,4 | 40,7 | |||||
| Michelin Energy Saver + | 37,5 | 38,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
