Segment
1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle2. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Frigo HP2 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Uniroyal). Uniroyal is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Uniroyal winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Debica (57%). In this particular case, the Debica Frigo HP2 has a better rating of 57% compared to 55% of the Uniroyal MS plus 77. The first tyre test of Debica Frigo HP2 was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Uniroyal MS plus 77 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Frigo HP2 and the MS plus 77 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Debica Frigo HP2
| Uniroyal MS plus 77
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R13 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.212. Debica Frigo HP2 16.13
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Good2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory2. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 1- | ||
| Debica Frigo HP2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2+ | ||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2- | 2+ | 2- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 34,2 | 24,1 | |||||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 | 32,8 | 24,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Debica Frigo HP2 Rating: Good | dobré | 2- | 2 | 2- | 2 | ||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 36,6 | 28,1 | |||||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 | 36,1 | 27,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||