Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle2. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Frigo HP2 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Debica winter tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Debica Frigo HP2 has a better rating of 57% compared to 55% of the Nokian WR Snowproof. The first tyre test of Debica Frigo HP2 was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autoklub ČR 2020 205/55 R16 test, where both the Frigo HP2 and the WR Snowproof were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 65% of Debica Frigo HP2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (86%) of the Nokian WR Snowproof also have B wet ratings.
| # | Debica Frigo HP2
| Nokian WR Snowproof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.072. Debica Frigo HP2 16.13
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Good2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory2. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended
Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 101,1 | 103,4 | 102,8 | 100 | |||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 95,66 | 91,8 | 95,8 | 99,4 | |||
| Nokian WR Snowproof | 95,63 | 90,3 | 100,5 | 96,1 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 1- | ||
| Debica Frigo HP2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2+ | ||
| Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Good | dobré | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 34,2 | 24,1 | |||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof | 32,2 | 24,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||