Segment
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Premium2. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Frigo HP2 vs. Michelin ALPIN 6
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Debica (57%). In this particular case, the Michelin ALPIN 6 has a better rating of 69% compared to 57% of the Debica Frigo HP2. The first tyre test of Debica Frigo HP2 was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Michelin ALPIN 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Frigo HP2 and the ALPIN 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 65% of Debica Frigo HP2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin ALPIN 6 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Debica Frigo HP2
| Michelin ALPIN 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 4.332. Debica Frigo HP2 16.13
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Exemplary2. Debica Frigo HP2 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Good2. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow traction
Snow handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,1 | 26,9 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 6 | 34,1 | 26,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 101,1 | 103,4 | 102,8 | 100 | |||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 95,66 | 91,8 | 95,8 | 99,4 | |||
| Michelin Alpin 6 | 98,66 | 97,4 | 99,2 | 99,4 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | ||
| Debica Frigo HP2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2+ | ||
| Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | 1- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 34,2 | 24,1 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 6 | 30,4 | 24,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
