In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Debica winter tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Falken (44%). In this particular case, the Falken EuroWinter HS01 has a better rating of 53% compared to 52% of the Debica Frigo HP2. The first tyre test of Debica Frigo HP2 was done in 2018, compared to 2017 when was the Falken EuroWinter HS01 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Frigo HP2 and the EuroWinter HS01 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 52% of Debica Frigo HP2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Falken EuroWinter HS01 also have B wet ratings.
# | Debica Frigo HP2
| Falken EuroWinter HS01
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R13 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,1 | 26,9 | |||||
Falken EuroWinter HS01 | 36,3 | 25,9 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
Debica Frigo HP2 | 34,2 | 24,1 | |||||
Falken EuroWinter HS01 | 33,9 | 26,1 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
Debica Frigo HP2 Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | 2- | 2 | |||
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2- | 2- | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
Debica Frigo HP2 | 36,6 | 28,1 | |||||
Falken EuroWinter HS01 | 36,2 | 28 | |||||
Show test details |