14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Debica Frigo HP2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Debica (57%). In this particular case, the Continental WinterContact TS 860 has a better rating of 64% compared to 57% of the Debica Frigo HP2. The first tyre test of Debica Frigo HP2 was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Continental WinterContact TS 860 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Frigo HP2 and the WinterContact TS 860 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 65% of Debica Frigo HP2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Continental WinterContact TS 860 also have B wet ratings.

#	Debica Frigo HP2 /57%	Continental WinterContact TS 860 /64%

Dimensions	R15 - R18	R13 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Premium

2. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 73

2. Debica Frigo HP2 25

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

2. Debica Frigo HP2 8x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

2. Debica Frigo HP2 7.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

2. Debica Frigo HP2 24.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

2. Debica Frigo HP2 16.13

Year of the last test

1. Debica Frigo HP2 2023

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

Best rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good

2. Debica Frigo HP2 Good

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Good

2. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

90%

Debica
Frigo HP2

73%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 94%

2. Debica Frigo HP2 72%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 92%

2. Debica Frigo HP2 68%

Wet handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 91%

2. Debica Frigo HP2 70%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 84%

2. Debica Frigo HP2 79%

Wet braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 91%

2. Debica Frigo HP2 78%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 B

2. Debica Frigo HP2 B

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

89%

Debica
Frigo HP2

86%

Snow braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 92%

2. Debica Frigo HP2 89%

Snow traction

1. Debica Frigo HP2 88%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 83%

Snow cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 92%

2. Debica Frigo HP2 82%

Snow handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 87%

2. Debica Frigo HP2 84%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

90%

Debica
Frigo HP2

78%

Exterior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 92%

2. Debica Frigo HP2 76%

Comfort

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 88%

2. Debica Frigo HP2 80%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 ?

2. Debica Frigo HP2 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

86%

Debica
Frigo HP2

78%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 84%

2. Debica Frigo HP2 82%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 88%

2. Debica Frigo HP2 75%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Debica
Frigo HP2

84%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

81%

Mileage

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 84%

2. Debica Frigo HP2 73%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 86%

2. Debica Frigo HP2 86%

Price/value

1. Debica Frigo HP2 94%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 72%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Debica Frigo HP2 C

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 C

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	příkladné	2+	2+	1	2+
Debica Frigo HP2 Rating: Conditionally recommended	podmíněně doporučeno	3	3	1	2+
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary	příkladné	2+	2+	1-	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Debica Frigo HP2	34,2	24,1
Continental WinterContact TS 860	31,5	24,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	příkladné	1-	2+	1	1
Debica Frigo HP2 Rating: Good	dobré	2-	2	2-	2
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary	příkladné	1-	2	2	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,3	27
Debica Frigo HP2	36,6	28,1
Continental WinterContact TS 860	34,5	27,6
Show test details

Comparison: Debica Frigo HP2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands