Segment
1. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle2. Debica Frigo 2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Debica winter tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Nokian (52%). But when it comes to comparing Debica Frigo 2 and Nokian WR D4, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Debica Frigo 2 was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR D4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 175/65 R14 test, where both the Frigo 2 and the WR D4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 74% of Debica Frigo 2 has C wet grip rating, whereas 97% of Nokian WR D4 has B rating.
# | Debica Frigo 2
| Nokian WR D4
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R13 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle2. Debica Frigo 2 Lowcost
2. Nokian WR D4 14.
2. Nokian WR D4 6.04
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. Debica Frigo 2 Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended2. Debica Frigo 2 Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
1. Nokian WR D4 89%
1. Nokian WR D4 85%
2. Nokian WR D4 82%
2. Nokian WR D4 67%
1. Nokian WR D4 86%
1. Nokian WR D4 69%
1. Nokian WR D4 69%
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 1,7 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
Debica Frigo 2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,9 | 2,9 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 2,0 | 2,2 |
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,4 | 2,6 | 2,7 | 2,4 | 3,8 | 2,0 | 2,2 |
Show test details |