Segment
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle2. Debica Frigo 2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (65%) than Debica (57%). But when it comes to comparing Debica Frigo 2 and Firestone Winterhawk 3, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Debica Frigo 2 was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Firestone Winterhawk 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 175/65 R14 test, where both the Frigo 2 and the Winterhawk 3 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 74% of Debica Frigo 2 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (92%) of the Firestone Winterhawk 3 also have C wet ratings.
# | Debica Frigo 2
| Firestone Winterhawk 3
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R13 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle2. Debica Frigo 2 Lowcost
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory2. Debica Frigo 2 Satisfactory
1. Debica Frigo 2 Satisfactory2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 1,7 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
Debica Frigo 2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,9 | 2,9 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 2,0 | 2,2 |
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,6 | 2,0 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 3,3 | 2,0 | 1,8 |
Show test details |