Segment
1. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Premium2. Debica Frigo 2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Dunlop). Dunlop is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Dunlop winter tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Debica (57%). The first tyre test of Debica Frigo 2 was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 175/65 R14 test, where both the Frigo 2 and the SP Winter Response 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 74% of Debica Frigo 2 has C wet grip rating, whereas 90% of Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 has B rating.
# | Debica Frigo 2
| Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R14 - R16 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Premium2. Debica Frigo 2 Lowcost
1. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Highly recommended2. Debica Frigo 2 Satisfactory
1. Debica Frigo 2 Satisfactory2. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Sufficient
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 1,7 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
Debica Frigo 2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,9 | 2,9 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 2,0 | 2,2 |
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Rating: Good | dobré | 1,8 | 2,4 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 3,4 | 2,0 | 1,7 |
Show test details |