Segment
2. Cooper Zeon CS Sport Upper-middle
Comparison: Cooper Zeon CS Sport vs. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from USA. Generally, GoodYear summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Cooper (38%). The first tyre test of Cooper Zeon CS Sport was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the Zeon CS Sport and the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Cooper Zeon CS Sport
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Cooper Zeon CS Sport 17.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Exemplary2. Cooper Zeon CS Sport Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Cooper Zeon CS Sport Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS Sport | 36 | 34,5 | |||||
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | 33,2 | 30,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Cooper Zeon CS Sport Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 2,0 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 2,5 | ||
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Good | 2,3 | 1,7 | 3,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
