Segment
1. Cooper Zeon CS Sport Upper-middle2. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle
Comparison: Cooper Zeon CS Sport vs. Falken Azenis FK510
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Cooper) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Cooper (38%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the Zeon CS Sport and the Azenis FK510 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Cooper Zeon CS Sport
| Falken Azenis FK510
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Cooper Zeon CS Sport 17.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary2. Cooper Zeon CS Sport Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended2. Cooper Zeon CS Sport Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS Sport | 36 | 34,5 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 36 | 30,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Cooper Zeon CS Sport Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 2,0 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 2,5 | ||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 2,9 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
