14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Vredestein Snowtrac 5

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Vredestein (71%). The first tyre test of Continental WinterContact TS 870 was done in 2020, compared to 2015 when was the Vredestein Snowtrac 5 first tested. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WinterContact TS 870 is made in France and Snowtrac 5 is made in Netherlands.

#	Continental WinterContact TS 870 /98%	Vredestein Snowtrac 5 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R13 - R16
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Premium

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Premium

Number of sizes available

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 41

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 13x

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 12x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 4.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 4.

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 30.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.38

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 12.58

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 2018

Best rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Very good

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Good

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Still recommended

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

88%

Vredestein
Snowtrac 5

84%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 82%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 91%

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 89%

Dry lane changing

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 95%

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 90%

Dry driving behavior

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 78%

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 78%

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

93%

Vredestein
Snowtrac 5

82%

Snow braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 92%

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 85%

Snow traction

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 84%

Snow handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 89%

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 79%

Snow cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 86%

Snow acceleration

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 97%

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 0%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

88%

Vredestein
Snowtrac 5

70%

Wet braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 67%

Wet handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 91%

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 71%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 73%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 73%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

87%

Vredestein
Snowtrac 5

69%

Exterior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 61%

Comfort

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 81%

Interior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 98%

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 67%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

80%

Vredestein
Snowtrac 5

70%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 80%

Mileage

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 83%

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 65%

Price/value

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 68%

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 65%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

85%

Vredestein
Snowtrac 5

83%

Ice braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 83%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Vredestein Snowtrac 5

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands