14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Germany. Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Fulda (42%). In this particular case, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 has a better rating of 98% compared to 59% of the Fulda Kristall Control HP2. The first tyre test of Continental WinterContact TS 870 was done in 2020, compared to 2017 when was the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the WinterContact TS 870 and the Kristall Control HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where WinterContact TS 870 is made - France.

#	Continental WinterContact TS 870 /98%	Fulda Kristall Control HP2 /59%

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R15 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Premium

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 51

Number of tests

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 20x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 13x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 4.

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 23.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.38

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 11.05

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2023

Best rating in test

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Good

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

94%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

71%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 81%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 64%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 73%

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

93%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

83%

Snow braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 85%

Snow traction

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 85%

Snow handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 88%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 65%

Snow cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 91%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 78%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

92%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

63%

Wet braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 47%

Wet handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 88%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 59%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 95%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 93%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 95%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 72%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 91%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 60%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 B

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

78%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

71%

Exterior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 81%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 65%

Comfort

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 80%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 76%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 72 dB

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

81%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

75%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 81%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 66%

Mileage

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 82%

Price/value

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 77%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 68%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 C

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

84.5%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

83.5%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	příkladné	2+	2+	1	2+
Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Exemplary	příkladné	2+	2+	1	2
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	uspokojivé	3+	3	3	3
Show test details

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34.6	28.9
Continental WinterContact TS 870	37.1	29.1
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	38.6	29.6
Show test details

Autozeitung Winter tyre test 2022 225/45 R17

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	vítěz testu	147	143	147
Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Test winner	vítěz testu	147	136	147
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	96	110	142
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	příkladné	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Exemplary	příkladné	2+	2	1-	2+	1
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	uspokojivé	3+	3+	2-	2	1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Continental WinterContact TS 870	34,2	27,7
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	36,8	28,6
Show test details

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands