In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Hankook (71%). In this particular case, the Continental WinterContact TS 860S has a better rating of 65% compared to 58% of the Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320. The first tyre test of Continental WinterContact TS 860S was done in 2019, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Offroad 2020 255/55 R19 test, where both the WinterContact TS 860S and the Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 73% of Continental WinterContact TS 860S dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (89%) of the Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 also have C wet ratings.
# | Continental WinterContact TS 860S | Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R16 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 Recommended
2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 Still recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1- | |||
Continental WinterContact TS 860S Rating: Recommended | 3 | 2 | 1- | 2+ | |||
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 Rating: Recommended | 3 | 3+ | 1 | 1- | |||
Show test details |