In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Yokohama (46%). But when it comes to comparing Continental VanContact Winter and Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Continental VanContact Winter was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the VanContact Winter and the BluEarth winter WY01 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Continental VanContact Winter dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 also have B wet ratings.
# | Continental VanContact Winter
| Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Continental VanContact Winter Rating: Recommended | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 2,8 | 3,1 | 3,0 | 2,2 |
Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 4,2 | 3,2 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
Show test details |