In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Kumho (38%). But when it comes to comparing Continental VanContact Winter and Kumho PorTran CW51, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Continental VanContact Winter was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Kumho PorTran CW51 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the VanContact Winter and the PorTran CW51 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Continental VanContact Winter has B wet grip rating, whereas 67% of Kumho PorTran CW51 has C rating.
# | Continental VanContact Winter
| Kumho PorTran CW51
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Continental VanContact Winter Rating: Recommended | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 2,8 | 3,1 | 3,0 | 2,2 |
Kumho PorTran CW51 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3,6 | 4,1 | 3,0 | 2,6 | 3,0 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
Show test details |