• 14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Continental VanContact Winter vs. Kumho PorTran CW51

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Kumho (38%). But when it comes to comparing Continental VanContact Winter and Kumho PorTran CW51, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Continental VanContact Winter was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Kumho PorTran CW51 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the VanContact Winter and the PorTran CW51 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Continental VanContact Winter has B wet grip rating, whereas 67% of Kumho PorTran CW51 has C rating.

# Continental VanContact Winter
/0%
Kumho PorTran CW51
/0%

Add to comparison

Continental
Kumho
DimensionsR14 - R17 R14 - R17
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ADAC
Name WetDrySnowIceNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test2,42,32,22,32,52,01,6
Continental VanContact Winter
Rating: Recommended
2,4 2,3 2,72,83,13,02,2
Kumho PorTran CW51
Rating: Conditionally recommended
3,64,13,02,63,03,02,0
Show test details