Segment
1. Continental VanContact 200 Premium2. Nokian cLine VAN Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental VanContact 200 vs. Nokian cLine VAN
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Nokian (66%). But when it comes to comparing Continental VanContact 200 and Nokian cLine VAN, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the VanContact 200 and the cLine VAN were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 77% of Continental VanContact 200 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian cLine VAN also have A wet ratings.
| # | Continental VanContact 200
| Nokian cLine VAN
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental VanContact 200 Satisfactory2. Nokian cLine VAN Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Continental VanContact 200 Satisfactory2. Nokian cLine VAN Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | |
| Continental VanContact 200 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 3,4 | 3,1 | 1,5 | 1,8 | |
| Nokian cLine VAN Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,3 | 3,0 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,1 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
