Segment
1. Continental VanContact 200 Premium2. Kumho PorTran KC53 Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental VanContact 200 vs. Kumho PorTran KC53
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Kumho (60%). But when it comes to comparing Continental VanContact 200 and Kumho PorTran KC53, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the VanContact 200 and the PorTran KC53 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 77% of Continental VanContact 200 has A wet grip rating, whereas 93% of Kumho PorTran KC53 has C rating.
| # | Continental VanContact 200
| Kumho PorTran KC53
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental VanContact 200 Satisfactory2. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Continental VanContact 200 Satisfactory2. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | |
| Continental VanContact 200 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 3,4 | 3,1 | 1,5 | 1,8 | |
| Kumho PorTran KC53 Rating: Sufficient | dostatečné | 3,8 | 3,2 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 2,0 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
