Segment
1. Continental VanContact 200 Premium2. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Premium
Comparison: Continental VanContact 200 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear). But when it comes to comparing Continental VanContact 200 and Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the VanContact 200 and the Efficientgrip Cargo were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 77% of Continental VanContact 200 has A wet grip rating, whereas 74% of Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo has B rating.
| # | Continental VanContact 200
| Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental VanContact 200 Satisfactory2. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Continental VanContact 200 Satisfactory2. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | |
| Continental VanContact 200 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 3,4 | 3,1 | 1,5 | 1,8 | |
| GoodYear Efficientgrip Cargo Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,1 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 0,5 | 2,0 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
