Segment
1. Continental VanContact 200 Premium2. Falken Linam VAN01 Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental VanContact 200 vs. Falken Linam VAN01
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Falken (70%). But when it comes to comparing Continental VanContact 200 and Falken Linam VAN01, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the VanContact 200 and the Linam VAN01 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 77% of Continental VanContact 200 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (96%) of the Falken Linam VAN01 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Continental VanContact 200
| Falken Linam VAN01
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental VanContact 200 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Continental VanContact 200 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | |
| Continental VanContact 200 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 3,4 | 3,1 | 1,5 | 1,8 | |
| Falken Linam VAN01 Rating: Poor | nedostatečné | 4,6 | 2,8 | 3,2 | 0,5 | 2,0 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
